There seems to be many ‘forbidden equations’ across many non-math and non-physics fields, and this one is really something.

For anyone who is curious, the short of it is: according to modern physics, photons are massless. This comes from Einstein’s relativity, I think. However, there appears to be a way to derive, from all modern physics theorems, a contradiction to that statement. This was a problem for Einstein and still currently is for all of those who consider Einstein to be the character he claimed to be).

Thus, the forbidden equation of i=qc. There are many ways to get to this according to Forrest Bishop

However, Miles Mathis takes a higher level (perspective, morality is irrelevant here )

Mathis states, about Einstein, in cited on page 1

“By skipping steps, ignoring theory, and a compensation of errors, Einstein was able to get near the correct equations for mass increase, but because his math and method was far too compressed and far too sloppy, he wasn’t able to see the role of charge in his field equations. Einstein understand that himself and said so: it is why he was working on unification the last four decades of his life. By unification, he meant he was trying to figure out how EM fit into his equations. Or to say it another way, how CHARGE fit into his equations.”

I’ve heard from others that Einstein wasn’t who he said he was. I am curious what other mistakes he made.

Paintball has it. Sports has it. Tarkov needs it.

Apparently Blow said: the problem with video game cutscenes is game devs don't study the theory around cinematography, or lighting, or blocking, or what even makes a good acting performance, they just autistically copy things without understanding what makes it work

I tend to agree. For example, typesetting used to be THE discipline. As a printer of centuries past, one would set the type, on a press, and know how to operate the machine, all while also manually spell-checking the content for accuracy, and loading paper, and unloading, and all the other things associated with creating typography in the 1600s.

Fast-foward to today, and typeography is one dialog box with a couple of arrows and some graphics explaining how these numbers impact the text. Kerning, font, shape, size, position, color, and every other potential attribute are CONSIDERED AND HANDLED by the software technology.

It used to be a discpline, that of ‘printing;’ It was a complex, life-long, family-business-style endeavour.

Now, that discipline is a minor, albeit still important, subset of a now much larger and much more complex practice.

Like all other old technologies and methods, all the techniques of film and tv will be ‘compressed,’ and the entire legacy media apparatus will be consumed by interactive entertainment cutscenes dialog boxes.

Put differently, Blow is describing the concept of ‘an image of an image’ written about by Guy Diebold (sp?) in Society of the Spectacle.

This is absolutely incredible. I understand (somewhat) the origins, and it’s bases on human input (training.) I’ll dig in to that process next.

But right now I’m launching a new art section because I think this stuff is worthy.

I’m going to find/build a platform, over time. But for now, this is it.

reference previous post `hyper multitasking’ and coin similar macro strategy of the musk grindset.

read twitter posts on this day: “rewrote code backend; thank you elon; i’ve never felt this alive.”

hyper-multitasking and hyper-focus.

multitask between specific problems. solve them one by one.

i hereby coin this term if it has not been already

I think we have near peak contraction (in computing terms). There is now enough CPU and GPU power to go around. During this time of economic uncertainty, those who use it the best will return the most value. How that value is created for the customer is tbd.

Oh, boy. Here comes another experience-less academic who has more experiences RESEARCHING than actually DOING. Do you see the pattern yet?

One quick look at his twitter feed reveals he re-tweets the always-wrong so-called “Max Boot,” who is a militant leftist and pushed conspiracy theories for years.

The reason I’ve gotten so sour on the cryptocurrency space is the ransomware. It’s doing tens to hundreds of billions of dollars worth of damage to the global economy. And it only exists because people can pay in Bitcoin.

Ok Nicholas, now do fiat currency.

This is blatantly an unlicensed security. This is blatant securities fraud, but they didn’t commit the securities fraud.

A so-called researcher from “UC Berkeley” decides he wants more regulation from the government that pays him? Another big surprise.

There’s no innovation to stifle. So regulate away.

Assuming the consequent, but I don’t expect anyone from Berkeley to understand such trivial concepts.

This absolute-joke-of-a-nobody of course uses the failed TerraUSD experiment as evidence of all crypto being a failure.

[T]he Washington Nationals just the other day started doing a lot of tweets for their business relationship with Terra. That was $5 million for five years prepaid in advance in cash. So for the next five years, the Washington Nationals are obliged to hype a cryptocurrency that failed spectacularly already.

This guy doesn’t have a clue. It’s almost like he’s lived and worked in an echo-chamber all his life.

It isn’t just technology that is contracting.

Obviously Fed rate hikes impact this…but it isn’t just THAT.

Ubiquitous computing means everyone can start a business.

Anyone starting a business means employees don’t want / don’t have to ‘work’ for someone.

Working for one-self (opposite of selling labor) create more opportunity for individual.

Individual (business) creates more direct value for consumer.

More value for consumer creates competition, and prices come down.

Enjoy!

This was said by someone random:

Tiling wms are a textbook example of a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

This was said by me:

It's a feature, not a software.

Update: In short, this post was meant to capture the idea that tons of opportunity exists…those who choose to use computer ‘the best’ are the ones who will benefit.

The compute market is driven by efficiency. Both efficiency of the machines, and the efficiency of the users using them.

In the context of computers, you can agree, or disagree, but the proof is in the payment.

Citing previous posts, including:

• The Great Contraction (05-22-2019)
• Re-Centralization (03-15-2018)
• A New Era (5-18-2020)
• Selling Computing Time (2-14-2020)

In other words, press buttons, get paid.

On the first day, He created Developers. On the second day, He created Operations. On the third day, He created DevOps. On the fourth day, I coined the phrase ArtistOps.

That’s the difference now. Who can use the computer (time) the best?

It’s blockchain.